2025.04.19 (토)

  • 흐림동두천 14.1℃
  • 구름많음강릉 13.1℃
  • 서울 15.2℃
  • 흐림대전 24.7℃
  • 구름많음대구 25.6℃
  • 구름많음울산 22.9℃
  • 흐림광주 22.9℃
  • 흐림부산 18.9℃
  • 흐림고창 22.4℃
  • 흐림제주 22.6℃
  • 흐림강화 11.0℃
  • 흐림보은 24.9℃
  • 흐림금산 24.5℃
  • 구름많음강진군 22.4℃
  • 구름많음경주시 26.4℃
  • 구름많음거제 17.8℃
기상청 제공

World

Delay Container-Scanning Rule Two Years? Not Good Enough, Importers Say (1)

U.S. importers have bought themselves another two years before they must implement a container-scanning rule that they believe should be scrapped altogether.



Mandated by the SAFE Port Act of 2006, the Department of Homeland Security issued a requirement that 100 percent of U.S.-bound ocean containers be scanned at the foreign port of origin. Since then, Congress and DHS have been kicking the can down the road, repeatedly delaying implementation of a rule that industry says is unworkable. The latest move puts off action until 2016.

But that’s not good enough for scores of industry associations representing everything from agricultural products to footwear, cookware, alcoholic beverages, chemicals, toys, explosives, Halloween costumes and turkeys. (Joining them were groups representing freight forwarders and customs brokers.) In a June 2 letter to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, they called for repeal of the mandate, along with a new focus on “practical supply chain security solutions.”

If implemented, the groups said, the scanning rule “would have a significantly negative impact on global commerce and cause significant conflict with the governments of our foreign trading partners, many of which have stated their opposition to the requirement previously.”

The rule, they said, raises a number of unanswered (if unanswerable) questions. How does DHS define the word “scanned”? Does it refer simply to taking an image of a container, or must authorities also analyze that image and determine whether the box merits further inspection? What standards would the scanning technology have to meet? Who would pay for purchasing, operating, maintaining and monitoring the equipment? What protocols would be followed at foreign ports?


From a diplomacy standpoint, what difficulties might U.S. inspectors face in obtaining permission from foreign ports and governments to carry out the scans? And how would the U.S. react if a foreign government turned the tables and insisted that its containerized imports from the U.S. be scanned here?

Finally, what resources would be required to scan and analyze every one of the 10-plus million ocean containers that enter the U.S. each year?
(Source : Forbes  |  To be continued)

Written by. ShippersJournal





배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너
배너